Discussing a New Parallel Tokenomics

[CooperLabs]

Thanks for the detailed feedback and suggestions. Much appreciated!

@Squirrely

May I kindly ask how big will a portion of the fee be?

For now, we plan to propose an amount of between 10% and 20% of the fees generated by the protocol.

@Squirrely

Does it make sense to vote for it after each Epoch? I think it might make sense to decide this case by case.

The percentage will be decided only once, when the formal proposal will be voted by the DAO, , and not at each epoch.

@Squirrely

I ask this question because I like our current strategie (although we have not fully implemeted yet) to invest in the parallel protocol (in the DAO) by taking the fees form parallel protocol to purchase governance from other protocols to incentivise our PAR/ PAUSD Pools.
This has give us a good postion in aura. If we want to go to further chains we should have sufficient captial to postion ourself in a similar fashion.

We couldn’t agree more. We believe that a strategy such as Amazon has pursued for the past 20 years, of reinvesting profits generated in the protocol to boost growth, is much more relevant in the medium and long term, rather than distributing all profits to sPRL holders.

@Squirrely

With regards to the PRL Emissions: 100% to the DAO Treasury ?
I think 100% should go to the DAO Treasury at first but from there they could be used to incentivise very specific pools which will be agreed supported by proposals.

Current & future MIMO tokens in the treasury will be used for the PoL, as voted in MGP-17.

@Squirrely

Fee Distribution:
Claim Period:
6 Epochs? → Does this mean that the individual would have need to claim the Fee’s latested Epoch 6 to not loose the Fee’s to the DAO Treasury?
If so I agree as well. → Yes

Yes, that’s right.